A prospective randomized study of the efficacy of "turning Point," an inpatient violence intervention program

Catherine Loveland-Jones, Lucas Ferrer, Scott Charles, Frederick Ramsey, Andrea Van Zandt, Jill Volgraf, Thomas Santora, Abhijit Pathak, Jay Dujon, Lars Sjoholm, Joseph Rappold, Amy Goldberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND From 2002 to 2011, there were more than 17,000 shootings in Philadelphia. "Turning Point," Temple University Hospital's inpatient violence intervention program, takes advantage of the teachable moment that occurs after violent injury. In addition to receiving traditional social work services, Turning Point patients watch their trauma bay resuscitation video and a movie about violence, meet with a gunshot wound survivor and an outpatient case manager, and also undergo psychiatric assessment. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of Turning Point in changing attitudes toward guns and violence among victims of penetrating trauma. METHODS This prospective randomized study was conducted from January 2012 to January 2014. Patients who sustained a gunshot or stab wound were randomized to standard of care, which involved traditional social work services only, or Turning Point. The Attitudes Toward Guns and Violence Questionnaire was administered to assess attitude change. Analysis was performed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. A p < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS A total of 80 of a potential 829 patients completed the study (40 standard of care, 40 Turning Point). The most common reason for exclusion was anticipated length of stay being less than 48 hours. The two groups were similar with respect to most demographics. Unlike the standard-of-care group, the Turning Point group demonstrated a 50% reduction in aggressive response to shame, a 29% reduction in comfort with aggression, and a 19% reduction in overall proclivity toward violence. CONCLUSIONS Turning Point is effective in changing attitudes toward guns and violence among victims of penetrating trauma. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine if this program can truly be a turning point in patients' lives. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/care management study, level II.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)834-842
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume81
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Attitudes toward violence
  • inpatient violence intervention program
  • penetrating trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A prospective randomized study of the efficacy of "turning Point," an inpatient violence intervention program'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Loveland-Jones, C., Ferrer, L., Charles, S., Ramsey, F., Van Zandt, A., Volgraf, J., Santora, T., Pathak, A., Dujon, J., Sjoholm, L., Rappold, J., & Goldberg, A. (2016). A prospective randomized study of the efficacy of "turning Point," an inpatient violence intervention program. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 81(5), 834-842. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001226