A placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

Renata Belfort, Stephen A. Harrison, Kenneth Brown, Celia Darland, Joan Finch, Jean Hardies, Bogdan Balas, Amalia Gastaldelli, Fermin Tio, Joseph Pulcini, Rachele Berria, Jennie Z. Ma, Sunil Dwivedi, Russell Havranek, Chris Fincke, Ralph DeFronzo, George A Bannayan, Steven Schenker, Kenneth Cusi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1416 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No pharmacologic therapy has conclusively proved to be effective for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, which is characterized by insulin resistance, steatosis, and necroinflammation with or without centrilobular fibrosis. Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione that ameliorates insulin resistance and improves glucose and lipid metabolism in type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We randomly assigned 55 patients with impaired glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes and liver biopsy-confirmed nonalcoholic steatohepatitis to 6 months of treatment with a hypocaloric diet (a reduction of 500 kcal per day in relation to the calculated daily intake required to maintain body weight) plus pioglitazone (45 mg daily) or a hypocaloric diet plus placebo. Before and after treatment, we assessed hepatic histologic features, hepatic fat content by means of magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and glucose turnover during an oral glucose tolerance test ([14C]glucose given with the oral glucose load and [3H]glucose given by intravenous infusion). RESULTS: Diet plus pioglitazone, as compared with diet plus placebo, improved glycemic control and glucose tolerance (P<0.001), normalized liver aminotransferase levels as it decreased plasma aspartate aminotransferase levels (by 40% vs. 21%, P = 0.04), decreased alanine aminotransferase levels (by 58% vs. 34%, P<0.001), decreased hepatic fat content (by 54% vs. 0%, P<0.001), and increased hepatic insulin sensitivity (by 48% vs. 14%, P = 0.008). Administration of pioglitazone, as compared with placebo, was associated with improvement in histologic findings with regard to steatosis (P = 0.003), ballooning necrosis (P = 0.02), and inflammation (P = 0.008). Subjects in the pioglitazone group had a greater reduction in necroinflammation (85% vs. 38%, P = 0.001), but the reduction in fibrosis did not differ significantly from that in the placebo group (P = 0.08). Fatigue and mild lower-extremity edema developed in one subject who received pioglitazone; no other adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this proof-of-concept study, the administration of pioglitazone led to metabolic and histologic improvement in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Larger controlled trials of longer duration are warranted to assess the long-term clinical benefit of pioglitazone. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00227110.)

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2297-2307
Number of pages11
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume355
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 30 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this