A meta-analysis comparing the effect of thiazolidinediones on cardiovascular risk factors

Elaine Chiquette, Gilbert Ramirez, Ralph DeFronzo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

269 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, all therapeutic options should be evaluated for their effect on cardiovascular risk factors, in addition to glycemic control. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of pioglitazone hydro chloride and rosiglitazone maleate in patients with type 2 diabetes to evaluate their effect on glycemic control, lipids, blood pressure, and weight. Methods: Randomized controlled trials of patients with type 2 diabetes that compared pioglitazone or rosiglitazone with placebo for 12 weeks were included. Primary analysis was to compare thiazolidinediones with placebo. Secondary analysis, was to identify whether treatment with pioglitazone differed from rosiglitazone in any outcomes. We calculated weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Twenty-three randomized controlled trials were identified. Both thiazolidinediones demonstrated similar hemoglobin A 1c level decreases of 1.0% to 1.5% and similar increases in body weight of approximately 3.0 kg. Pioglitazone significantly lowered triglyceride level (-40 mg/dL [-0.45 mmol/L]; 95% confidence interval [CI], -53 to -26 mg/dL [-0.60 to -0.29 mmol/L]), increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level (+4.6 mg/dL [+0.12 mmol/L]; 95% CI, 3.6 to 5.5 mg/dL [0.09 to 0.14 mmol/L]), and showed neutral effect on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and total cholesterol levels. Rosiglitazone significantly increased HDL-C level (+2.7 mg/dL [+0.07 mmol/L]; 95% CI, 2.0 to 3.4 mg/dL [0.05 to 0.09 mmol/L]), but increased LDL-C level (+15 mg/dL [+0.39 mmol/L]; 95% CI, 13 to 17 mg/dL [0.34 to 0.44 mmol/L]), total cholesterol level (+21 mg/dL [+0.54 mmol/L]; 95% CI, 18 to 25 mg/dL [0.47 to 0.65 mmol/L]), and demonstrated neutral effect on triglyceride level (-1.1 mg/dL [-0.12 mmol/L]; 95% CI, -14 to 12 mg/dL [-0.16 to 0.14 mmol/L]). No data were available on pioglitazone and blood pressure. Rosiglitazone had a neutral effect on systolic (-0.7 mm Hg; 95% CI, -2.6 to 1.1 mm Hg) and diastolic (-0.8 mm Hg; 95% CI, -1.8 to 0.3) blood pressure. Conclusion: Thiazolidinediones have similar effects on glycemic control and body weight. Pioglitazone produced a more favorable lipid profile. Head-to-head comparative trials as well as longer-term cardiovascular outcome studies are needed to determine whether there are differences in efficacy between the 2 thiazolidinediones.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2097-2104
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Internal Medicine
Volume164
Issue number19
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 25 2004

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A meta-analysis comparing the effect of thiazolidinediones on cardiovascular risk factors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this