A mathematical model for predicting toothbrush stiffness

Henry R Rawls, N. J. Mkwayi-Tulloch, M. E. Krull

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Both cleaning efficiency and gingival damage depend on the access of toothbrush bristles to sheltered areas and their ability to deliver sufficient force to remove plaque as they travel over tooth surfaces. A mathematical expression was therefore developed which relates bristle properties and features of brush construction to overall brush stiffness, in order to provide a framework for the prediction and systematic investigation of brush performance:. Brush stiffness = 0.125E(DBDT)2NTPf/L3. This shows that brush stiffness is predominantly affected by bristle modulus (E), bristle and tuft diameter (DB and DT), the number of tufts (NT), the number of bristles per unit area packed into a tuft hole (Pf = packing factor), and the trim length of bristles (L). Bristle composition and shape had no measurable effect. The 0.125 factor is empirically derived and probably depends on visco-elastic, frictional, and other dynamic effects which were not examined. Thus, this is a first-order approximation, and further work must be done to account for bristle interactions and brushing rate, and to correlate stiffness with a measure of cleaning efficiency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-117
Number of pages7
JournalDental Materials
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Brushes
Tooth
Theoretical Models
Stiffness
Mathematical models
Cleaning
Chemical analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

A mathematical model for predicting toothbrush stiffness. / Rawls, Henry R; Mkwayi-Tulloch, N. J.; Krull, M. E.

In: Dental Materials, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1990, p. 111-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rawls, Henry R ; Mkwayi-Tulloch, N. J. ; Krull, M. E. / A mathematical model for predicting toothbrush stiffness. In: Dental Materials. 1990 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 111-117.
@article{d5926a56c9414e66a5473c6dc97cda40,
title = "A mathematical model for predicting toothbrush stiffness",
abstract = "Both cleaning efficiency and gingival damage depend on the access of toothbrush bristles to sheltered areas and their ability to deliver sufficient force to remove plaque as they travel over tooth surfaces. A mathematical expression was therefore developed which relates bristle properties and features of brush construction to overall brush stiffness, in order to provide a framework for the prediction and systematic investigation of brush performance:. Brush stiffness = 0.125E(DBDT)2NTPf/L3. This shows that brush stiffness is predominantly affected by bristle modulus (E), bristle and tuft diameter (DB and DT), the number of tufts (NT), the number of bristles per unit area packed into a tuft hole (Pf = packing factor), and the trim length of bristles (L). Bristle composition and shape had no measurable effect. The 0.125 factor is empirically derived and probably depends on visco-elastic, frictional, and other dynamic effects which were not examined. Thus, this is a first-order approximation, and further work must be done to account for bristle interactions and brushing rate, and to correlate stiffness with a measure of cleaning efficiency.",
author = "Rawls, {Henry R} and Mkwayi-Tulloch, {N. J.} and Krull, {M. E.}",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1016/S0109-5641(05)80040-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "111--117",
journal = "Dental Materials",
issn = "0109-5641",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A mathematical model for predicting toothbrush stiffness

AU - Rawls, Henry R

AU - Mkwayi-Tulloch, N. J.

AU - Krull, M. E.

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - Both cleaning efficiency and gingival damage depend on the access of toothbrush bristles to sheltered areas and their ability to deliver sufficient force to remove plaque as they travel over tooth surfaces. A mathematical expression was therefore developed which relates bristle properties and features of brush construction to overall brush stiffness, in order to provide a framework for the prediction and systematic investigation of brush performance:. Brush stiffness = 0.125E(DBDT)2NTPf/L3. This shows that brush stiffness is predominantly affected by bristle modulus (E), bristle and tuft diameter (DB and DT), the number of tufts (NT), the number of bristles per unit area packed into a tuft hole (Pf = packing factor), and the trim length of bristles (L). Bristle composition and shape had no measurable effect. The 0.125 factor is empirically derived and probably depends on visco-elastic, frictional, and other dynamic effects which were not examined. Thus, this is a first-order approximation, and further work must be done to account for bristle interactions and brushing rate, and to correlate stiffness with a measure of cleaning efficiency.

AB - Both cleaning efficiency and gingival damage depend on the access of toothbrush bristles to sheltered areas and their ability to deliver sufficient force to remove plaque as they travel over tooth surfaces. A mathematical expression was therefore developed which relates bristle properties and features of brush construction to overall brush stiffness, in order to provide a framework for the prediction and systematic investigation of brush performance:. Brush stiffness = 0.125E(DBDT)2NTPf/L3. This shows that brush stiffness is predominantly affected by bristle modulus (E), bristle and tuft diameter (DB and DT), the number of tufts (NT), the number of bristles per unit area packed into a tuft hole (Pf = packing factor), and the trim length of bristles (L). Bristle composition and shape had no measurable effect. The 0.125 factor is empirically derived and probably depends on visco-elastic, frictional, and other dynamic effects which were not examined. Thus, this is a first-order approximation, and further work must be done to account for bristle interactions and brushing rate, and to correlate stiffness with a measure of cleaning efficiency.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025418398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025418398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0109-5641(05)80040-5

DO - 10.1016/S0109-5641(05)80040-5

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 111

EP - 117

JO - Dental Materials

JF - Dental Materials

SN - 0109-5641

IS - 2

ER -