A comparison of echocardiographic modalities to guide structural heart disease interventions

Paul A. Hudson, Marvin H. Eng, Michael S. Kim, Robert A. Quaife, Ernesto E. Salcedo, John D. Carroll

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


Percutaneous techniques to treat structural heart disease are rapidly evolving based on innovative interventions and the considerable advancement in image guidance technology. While two-dimensional transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography have been integral to procedural planning and execution, intracardiac and three-dimensional echocardiography supply unique visualization of target structures with a potential improvement in patient safety and procedural efficacy. The choice of image guidance modality is based on specific differences between imaging systems, as well as other variables including cost, patient safety, operator expertise, and complexity of procedure. We will compare the adjunctive imaging tools for structural heart disease interventions, with a focus on intracardiac echocardiography and real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)535-546
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Interventional Cardiology
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of echocardiographic modalities to guide structural heart disease interventions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this