A Comparison of Clinical Follow-Up of Different Total Temporomandibular Joint Replacement Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Luxiang Zou, Dongmei He, Edward Ellis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

Purpose There are different total temporomandibular joint (TMJ) prostheses on the market but no comparison of their efficacy. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of different TMJ replacement (TJR) systems. Materials and Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library search engines in May 2017 to identify qualified studies. Outcome measurements were changes in maximal incisal opening (MIO), pain, dietary limitations, and functional deficiencies from before to after TJR. Analyses of heterogeneity, sensitivity, and publication bias were performed. A fixed-effects model was used for the meta-analysis of pooled weighted mean differences in pre- versus postoperative MIO, pain, diet, and function. Results Twenty studies with 1,262 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Comparison of the TJR systems showed no real difference for pre- versus postoperative MIO, pain, diet, and function. MIO and functional efficiency decreased gradually over time, but effective pain relief and improvements in dietary limitations were stable with no relevant differences during follow-up. Comparison of the custom and stock devices showed similar results for pre- and postoperative MIO, pain, function, and diet. Conclusion This analysis showed no relevant difference in treatment outcomes among the TJR systems.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages294-303
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume76
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Replacement Arthroplasties
Joint Prosthesis
Temporomandibular Joint
Meta-Analysis
Pain
Diet
Search Engine
Publication Bias
PubMed
Libraries
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oral Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

A Comparison of Clinical Follow-Up of Different Total Temporomandibular Joint Replacement Prostheses : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. / Zou, Luxiang; He, Dongmei; Ellis, Edward.

In: Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 76, No. 2, 01.02.2018, p. 294-303.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{155006c9aa7141e4a08f7344dd2588de,
title = "A Comparison of Clinical Follow-Up of Different Total Temporomandibular Joint Replacement Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis",
abstract = "Purpose There are different total temporomandibular joint (TMJ) prostheses on the market but no comparison of their efficacy. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of different TMJ replacement (TJR) systems. Materials and Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library search engines in May 2017 to identify qualified studies. Outcome measurements were changes in maximal incisal opening (MIO), pain, dietary limitations, and functional deficiencies from before to after TJR. Analyses of heterogeneity, sensitivity, and publication bias were performed. A fixed-effects model was used for the meta-analysis of pooled weighted mean differences in pre- versus postoperative MIO, pain, diet, and function. Results Twenty studies with 1,262 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Comparison of the TJR systems showed no real difference for pre- versus postoperative MIO, pain, diet, and function. MIO and functional efficiency decreased gradually over time, but effective pain relief and improvements in dietary limitations were stable with no relevant differences during follow-up. Comparison of the custom and stock devices showed similar results for pre- and postoperative MIO, pain, function, and diet. Conclusion This analysis showed no relevant difference in treatment outcomes among the TJR systems.",
author = "Luxiang Zou and Dongmei He and Edward Ellis",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "294--303",
journal = "Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery",
issn = "0278-2391",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of Clinical Follow-Up of Different Total Temporomandibular Joint Replacement Prostheses

T2 - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

AU - Zou, Luxiang

AU - He, Dongmei

AU - Ellis, Edward

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Purpose There are different total temporomandibular joint (TMJ) prostheses on the market but no comparison of their efficacy. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of different TMJ replacement (TJR) systems. Materials and Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library search engines in May 2017 to identify qualified studies. Outcome measurements were changes in maximal incisal opening (MIO), pain, dietary limitations, and functional deficiencies from before to after TJR. Analyses of heterogeneity, sensitivity, and publication bias were performed. A fixed-effects model was used for the meta-analysis of pooled weighted mean differences in pre- versus postoperative MIO, pain, diet, and function. Results Twenty studies with 1,262 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Comparison of the TJR systems showed no real difference for pre- versus postoperative MIO, pain, diet, and function. MIO and functional efficiency decreased gradually over time, but effective pain relief and improvements in dietary limitations were stable with no relevant differences during follow-up. Comparison of the custom and stock devices showed similar results for pre- and postoperative MIO, pain, function, and diet. Conclusion This analysis showed no relevant difference in treatment outcomes among the TJR systems.

AB - Purpose There are different total temporomandibular joint (TMJ) prostheses on the market but no comparison of their efficacy. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of different TMJ replacement (TJR) systems. Materials and Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library search engines in May 2017 to identify qualified studies. Outcome measurements were changes in maximal incisal opening (MIO), pain, dietary limitations, and functional deficiencies from before to after TJR. Analyses of heterogeneity, sensitivity, and publication bias were performed. A fixed-effects model was used for the meta-analysis of pooled weighted mean differences in pre- versus postoperative MIO, pain, diet, and function. Results Twenty studies with 1,262 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Comparison of the TJR systems showed no real difference for pre- versus postoperative MIO, pain, diet, and function. MIO and functional efficiency decreased gradually over time, but effective pain relief and improvements in dietary limitations were stable with no relevant differences during follow-up. Comparison of the custom and stock devices showed similar results for pre- and postoperative MIO, pain, function, and diet. Conclusion This analysis showed no relevant difference in treatment outcomes among the TJR systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030237064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030237064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.022

DO - 10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.022

M3 - Review article

VL - 76

SP - 294

EP - 303

JO - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

SN - 0278-2391

IS - 2

ER -