A comparative study of three glass ionomer base materials.

J. O. Burgess, N. Barghi, D. C. Chan, T. Hummert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared the compressive and diametral tensile strength, compressive modulus, shear bond strength to dentin and resin composite, marginal gap between the base and tooth in Class V cavity preparation, and fluoride release of three glass ionomer base materials. In general, visible light-cured (VLC) base materials outperform the autopolymerizing glass ionomer base Ketac-Bond. The compressive modulus is significantly less for the VLC glass ionomer materials Vitrebond and Fuji LC compared to Ketac-Bond. The Fuji LC had greater diametral tensile strength, compressive strength, bond to dentin and bond to resin composite than Vitrebond or Ketac-Bond. The fluoride release of Vitrebond was greater than Ketac-Bond or Fuji LC. The marginal gap at the tooth/base interface was significantly less with the Fuji LC compared to the other two materials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)137-141
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Dentistry
Volume6
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 1993

Fingerprint

Composite Resins
Tensile Strength
Dentin
Fluorides
Tooth
Compressive Strength
Light
Shear Strength
glass ionomer
Fuji glass-ionomer lining cement
Ketac-Bond
Vitrabond

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Burgess, J. O., Barghi, N., Chan, D. C., & Hummert, T. (1993). A comparative study of three glass ionomer base materials. American Journal of Dentistry, 6(3), 137-141.

A comparative study of three glass ionomer base materials. / Burgess, J. O.; Barghi, N.; Chan, D. C.; Hummert, T.

In: American Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 6, No. 3, 06.1993, p. 137-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burgess, JO, Barghi, N, Chan, DC & Hummert, T 1993, 'A comparative study of three glass ionomer base materials.', American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 137-141.
Burgess, J. O. ; Barghi, N. ; Chan, D. C. ; Hummert, T. / A comparative study of three glass ionomer base materials. In: American Journal of Dentistry. 1993 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 137-141.
@article{0291e324e41a4fd4890ad41ce50470f0,
title = "A comparative study of three glass ionomer base materials.",
abstract = "This study compared the compressive and diametral tensile strength, compressive modulus, shear bond strength to dentin and resin composite, marginal gap between the base and tooth in Class V cavity preparation, and fluoride release of three glass ionomer base materials. In general, visible light-cured (VLC) base materials outperform the autopolymerizing glass ionomer base Ketac-Bond. The compressive modulus is significantly less for the VLC glass ionomer materials Vitrebond and Fuji LC compared to Ketac-Bond. The Fuji LC had greater diametral tensile strength, compressive strength, bond to dentin and bond to resin composite than Vitrebond or Ketac-Bond. The fluoride release of Vitrebond was greater than Ketac-Bond or Fuji LC. The marginal gap at the tooth/base interface was significantly less with the Fuji LC compared to the other two materials.",
author = "Burgess, {J. O.} and N. Barghi and Chan, {D. C.} and T. Hummert",
year = "1993",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "137--141",
journal = "American Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0894-8275",
publisher = "Mosher and Linder, Inc",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of three glass ionomer base materials.

AU - Burgess, J. O.

AU - Barghi, N.

AU - Chan, D. C.

AU - Hummert, T.

PY - 1993/6

Y1 - 1993/6

N2 - This study compared the compressive and diametral tensile strength, compressive modulus, shear bond strength to dentin and resin composite, marginal gap between the base and tooth in Class V cavity preparation, and fluoride release of three glass ionomer base materials. In general, visible light-cured (VLC) base materials outperform the autopolymerizing glass ionomer base Ketac-Bond. The compressive modulus is significantly less for the VLC glass ionomer materials Vitrebond and Fuji LC compared to Ketac-Bond. The Fuji LC had greater diametral tensile strength, compressive strength, bond to dentin and bond to resin composite than Vitrebond or Ketac-Bond. The fluoride release of Vitrebond was greater than Ketac-Bond or Fuji LC. The marginal gap at the tooth/base interface was significantly less with the Fuji LC compared to the other two materials.

AB - This study compared the compressive and diametral tensile strength, compressive modulus, shear bond strength to dentin and resin composite, marginal gap between the base and tooth in Class V cavity preparation, and fluoride release of three glass ionomer base materials. In general, visible light-cured (VLC) base materials outperform the autopolymerizing glass ionomer base Ketac-Bond. The compressive modulus is significantly less for the VLC glass ionomer materials Vitrebond and Fuji LC compared to Ketac-Bond. The Fuji LC had greater diametral tensile strength, compressive strength, bond to dentin and bond to resin composite than Vitrebond or Ketac-Bond. The fluoride release of Vitrebond was greater than Ketac-Bond or Fuji LC. The marginal gap at the tooth/base interface was significantly less with the Fuji LC compared to the other two materials.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027605742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027605742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8240775

AN - SCOPUS:0027605742

VL - 6

SP - 137

EP - 141

JO - American Journal of Dentistry

JF - American Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0894-8275

IS - 3

ER -