A comparative study of contrast dacryocystogram and nuclear dacryocystogram

T. K. Chaudhuri, G. R. Saparoff, K. D. Dolan, T. K. Chaudhuri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

A comparative study was run between conventional radiographic contrast dacryocystogram and radioisotope scan of the lacrimal drainage apparatus (henceforth called 'nuclear dacryocystogram'). A total of 20 contrast dacryocystograms (DCG), 22 irrigations, and 42 nuclear dacryocystograms (DCG) were performed in 21 patients having symptoms of obstruction in the lacrimal drainage system. The study revealed that there was a good correlation between these two diagnostic techniques and nuclear DCG was, perhaps, superior to contrast DCG.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)605-608
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Nuclear Medicine
Volume16
Issue number7
StatePublished - Dec 1 1975
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative study of contrast dacryocystogram and nuclear dacryocystogram'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this