TY - JOUR
T1 - A bias-ed assessment of the use of SNPs in human complex traits
AU - Terwilliger, Joseph D.
AU - Haghighi, Fatemeh
AU - Hiekkalinna, Tero S.
AU - Göring, Harald H.H.
N1 - Funding Information:
Grants MH63749, MH59490, HL45522, HL28972, GM31575, MH59490 from the National Institutes Health and Alfred E. Sloan/DOE training grant DE-FG02-00ERG2970 are gratefully acknowledged, as is support from the Emil Aaltonen Foundation. Thanks to Joseph H Lee and Kenneth M Weiss and the editors of this issue for critical reading and comments on the manuscript.
PY - 2002/12/1
Y1 - 2002/12/1
N2 - Although many biotechnological advancements have been made in the past decade, there has been very limited success in unraveling the genetic component of complex traits. Heavily invested research has been initiated based on etiological models of unrealistic simplicity and conducted under poor experimental designs, on data sets of insufficient size, leading to an overestimation of the effect sizes of genetic variants and the quantity and quality of linkage disequilibrium (LD). Arguments about whether families or unrelated individuals provide more power for gene mapping have been erroneously debated as issues of whether linkage or LD are more detectable sorts of correlation. Although the latter issue may be subject to debate, there is no doubt that family-based analysis is more powerful for detecting linkage and/or LD. If the recent advances in biotechnology are to be exploited effectively, vastly improved study designs will be imperative, as the reasons for the lack of success to date have much more to do with biology than technology, an issue that has become increasingly clear with the findings of the past years.
AB - Although many biotechnological advancements have been made in the past decade, there has been very limited success in unraveling the genetic component of complex traits. Heavily invested research has been initiated based on etiological models of unrealistic simplicity and conducted under poor experimental designs, on data sets of insufficient size, leading to an overestimation of the effect sizes of genetic variants and the quantity and quality of linkage disequilibrium (LD). Arguments about whether families or unrelated individuals provide more power for gene mapping have been erroneously debated as issues of whether linkage or LD are more detectable sorts of correlation. Although the latter issue may be subject to debate, there is no doubt that family-based analysis is more powerful for detecting linkage and/or LD. If the recent advances in biotechnology are to be exploited effectively, vastly improved study designs will be imperative, as the reasons for the lack of success to date have much more to do with biology than technology, an issue that has become increasingly clear with the findings of the past years.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036888970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036888970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0959-437X(02)00357-X
DO - 10.1016/S0959-437X(02)00357-X
M3 - Review article
C2 - 12433588
AN - SCOPUS:0036888970
SN - 0959-437X
VL - 12
SP - 726
EP - 734
JO - Current Opinion in Genetics and Development
JF - Current Opinion in Genetics and Development
IS - 6
ER -