TY - JOUR
T1 - 2017 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support
AU - Beck, Joni
AU - Greenwood, Deborah A.
AU - Blanton, Lori
AU - Bollinger, Sandra T.
AU - Butcher, Marcene K.
AU - Condon, Jo Ellen
AU - Cypress, Marjorie
AU - Faulkner, Priscilla
AU - Fischl, Amy Hess
AU - Francis, Theresa
AU - Kolb, Leslie E.
AU - Lavin-Tompkins, Jodi M.
AU - MacLeod, Janice
AU - Maryniuk, Melinda
AU - Mensing, Carolé
AU - Orzeck, Eric A.
AU - Pope, David D.
AU - Pulizzi, Jodi L.
AU - Reed, Ardis A.
AU - Rhinehart, Andrew S.
AU - Siminerio, Linda
AU - Wang, Jing
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s).
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to review the literature for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) to ensure the National Standards for DSMES (Standards) align with current evidence-based practices and utilization trends. Methods: The 10 Standards were divided among 20 interdisciplinary workgroup members. Members searched the current research for diabetes education and support, behavioral health, clinical, health care environment, technical, reimbursement, and business practice for the strongest evidence that guided the Standards revision. Results: Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support facilitates the knowledge, skills, and ability necessary for diabetes self-care as well as activities that assist a person in implementing and sustaining the behaviors needed to manage their condition on an ongoing basis. The evidence indicates that health care providers and people affected by diabetes are embracing technology, and this is having a positive impact of DSMES access, utilization, and outcomes. Conclusion: Quality DSMES continues to be a critical element of care for all people with diabetes. The DSMES services must be individualized and guided by the concerns, preferences, and needs of the person affected by diabetes. Even with the abundance of evidence supporting the benefits of DSMES, it continues to be underutilized, but as with other health care services, technology is changing the way DSMES is delivered and utilized with positive outcomes.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to review the literature for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) to ensure the National Standards for DSMES (Standards) align with current evidence-based practices and utilization trends. Methods: The 10 Standards were divided among 20 interdisciplinary workgroup members. Members searched the current research for diabetes education and support, behavioral health, clinical, health care environment, technical, reimbursement, and business practice for the strongest evidence that guided the Standards revision. Results: Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support facilitates the knowledge, skills, and ability necessary for diabetes self-care as well as activities that assist a person in implementing and sustaining the behaviors needed to manage their condition on an ongoing basis. The evidence indicates that health care providers and people affected by diabetes are embracing technology, and this is having a positive impact of DSMES access, utilization, and outcomes. Conclusion: Quality DSMES continues to be a critical element of care for all people with diabetes. The DSMES services must be individualized and guided by the concerns, preferences, and needs of the person affected by diabetes. Even with the abundance of evidence supporting the benefits of DSMES, it continues to be underutilized, but as with other health care services, technology is changing the way DSMES is delivered and utilized with positive outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078551519&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078551519&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0145721719897952
DO - 10.1177/0145721719897952
M3 - Article
C2 - 31874594
AN - SCOPUS:85078551519
SN - 0145-7217
VL - 46
SP - 46
EP - 61
JO - Diabetes Educator
JF - Diabetes Educator
IS - 1
ER -