2-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy

John W. Osborne, James B Summitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the clinical performance of 2-year old gallium alloy restorations. Parameters evaluated include: (1) fracture at the margins, (2) tarnish, (3) surface roughness, (4) tooth fracture, (5) fracture through the body of the restoration, and (6) any medical or dental conditions arising during the study. Materials and Methods: Nine patients received 30 Class I restorations of Galloy gallium alloy. These were placed as conservatively as possible under a rubber dam. Fifteen of the preparations were lined with a Bis-GMA resin to seal the restoration from moisture. The other 15 preparations were sealed with Amalgambond. After placement of the gallium alloy, the exposed surfaces of all restorations were sealed with the Bis-GMA resin, and the occlusion was checked. The restorations were examined at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Results: At the 2-year recall, all restorations were intact with the exception of one tooth fracture (cause unknown). Forty-five percent of the restorations exhibited tarnish and 60% had a rough surface. The fracture at the margins of these restorations was minimal, and no significant difference could be found between those using Amalgambond and those sealed with the resin system. No medical problems were reported by the patients, and postoperative sensitivity was minimal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)191-194
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Dentistry
Volume9
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Tooth Fractures
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate
Rubber Dams
Tooth
Metallodent-C
Amalgambond

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Osborne, J. W., & Summitt, J. B. (1996). 2-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy. American Journal of Dentistry, 9(5), 191-194.

2-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy. / Osborne, John W.; Summitt, James B.

In: American Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 9, No. 5, 1996, p. 191-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Osborne, JW & Summitt, JB 1996, '2-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy', American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 191-194.
Osborne, John W. ; Summitt, James B. / 2-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy. In: American Journal of Dentistry. 1996 ; Vol. 9, No. 5. pp. 191-194.
@article{235206e744f8408f8cbe47cdb94059e8,
title = "2-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess the clinical performance of 2-year old gallium alloy restorations. Parameters evaluated include: (1) fracture at the margins, (2) tarnish, (3) surface roughness, (4) tooth fracture, (5) fracture through the body of the restoration, and (6) any medical or dental conditions arising during the study. Materials and Methods: Nine patients received 30 Class I restorations of Galloy gallium alloy. These were placed as conservatively as possible under a rubber dam. Fifteen of the preparations were lined with a Bis-GMA resin to seal the restoration from moisture. The other 15 preparations were sealed with Amalgambond. After placement of the gallium alloy, the exposed surfaces of all restorations were sealed with the Bis-GMA resin, and the occlusion was checked. The restorations were examined at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Results: At the 2-year recall, all restorations were intact with the exception of one tooth fracture (cause unknown). Forty-five percent of the restorations exhibited tarnish and 60{\%} had a rough surface. The fracture at the margins of these restorations was minimal, and no significant difference could be found between those using Amalgambond and those sealed with the resin system. No medical problems were reported by the patients, and postoperative sensitivity was minimal.",
author = "Osborne, {John W.} and Summitt, {James B}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "191--194",
journal = "American Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0894-8275",
publisher = "Mosher and Linder, Inc",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 2-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy

AU - Osborne, John W.

AU - Summitt, James B

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Purpose: To assess the clinical performance of 2-year old gallium alloy restorations. Parameters evaluated include: (1) fracture at the margins, (2) tarnish, (3) surface roughness, (4) tooth fracture, (5) fracture through the body of the restoration, and (6) any medical or dental conditions arising during the study. Materials and Methods: Nine patients received 30 Class I restorations of Galloy gallium alloy. These were placed as conservatively as possible under a rubber dam. Fifteen of the preparations were lined with a Bis-GMA resin to seal the restoration from moisture. The other 15 preparations were sealed with Amalgambond. After placement of the gallium alloy, the exposed surfaces of all restorations were sealed with the Bis-GMA resin, and the occlusion was checked. The restorations were examined at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Results: At the 2-year recall, all restorations were intact with the exception of one tooth fracture (cause unknown). Forty-five percent of the restorations exhibited tarnish and 60% had a rough surface. The fracture at the margins of these restorations was minimal, and no significant difference could be found between those using Amalgambond and those sealed with the resin system. No medical problems were reported by the patients, and postoperative sensitivity was minimal.

AB - Purpose: To assess the clinical performance of 2-year old gallium alloy restorations. Parameters evaluated include: (1) fracture at the margins, (2) tarnish, (3) surface roughness, (4) tooth fracture, (5) fracture through the body of the restoration, and (6) any medical or dental conditions arising during the study. Materials and Methods: Nine patients received 30 Class I restorations of Galloy gallium alloy. These were placed as conservatively as possible under a rubber dam. Fifteen of the preparations were lined with a Bis-GMA resin to seal the restoration from moisture. The other 15 preparations were sealed with Amalgambond. After placement of the gallium alloy, the exposed surfaces of all restorations were sealed with the Bis-GMA resin, and the occlusion was checked. The restorations were examined at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Results: At the 2-year recall, all restorations were intact with the exception of one tooth fracture (cause unknown). Forty-five percent of the restorations exhibited tarnish and 60% had a rough surface. The fracture at the margins of these restorations was minimal, and no significant difference could be found between those using Amalgambond and those sealed with the resin system. No medical problems were reported by the patients, and postoperative sensitivity was minimal.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030251829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030251829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9545902

AN - SCOPUS:0030251829

VL - 9

SP - 191

EP - 194

JO - American Journal of Dentistry

JF - American Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0894-8275

IS - 5

ER -