TY - JOUR
T1 - ítems de referencia para publicar Protocolos de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis
T2 - Declaración PRISMA-P 2015
AU - PRISMA-P Group
AU - Moher, David
AU - Shamseer, Larissa
AU - Clarke, Mike
AU - Ghersi, Davina
AU - Liberati, Alessandro
AU - Petticrew, Mark
AU - Shekelle, Paul
AU - Stewart, Lesley A.
AU - Estarli, Mireia
AU - Barrera, Eliud S.Aguilar
AU - Martínez-Rodríguez, Rodrigo
AU - Baladia, Eduard
AU - Agüero, Samuel Duran
AU - Camacho, Saby
AU - Buhring, Kristian
AU - Herrero-López, Aitor
AU - Gil-González, Diana Maria
AU - Altman, Douglas G.
AU - Booth, Alison
AU - Chan, An Wen
AU - Chang, Stephanie
AU - Clifford, Tammy
AU - Dickersin, Kay
AU - Egger, Matthias
AU - Gøtzsche, Peter C.
AU - Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
AU - Groves, Trish
AU - Helfand, Mark
AU - Higgins, Julian
AU - Lasserson, Toby
AU - Lau, Joseph
AU - Lohr, Kathleen
AU - McGowan, Jessie
AU - Mulrow, Cynthia
AU - Norton, Melissa
AU - Page, Matthew
AU - Sampson, Margaret
AU - Schünemann, Holger
AU - Simera, Iveta
AU - Summerskill, William
AU - Tetzlaff, Jennifer
AU - Trikalinos, Thomas A.
AU - Tovey, David
AU - Turner, Lucy
AU - Whitlock, Evelyn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Asociacion Espanola de Dietistas-Nutricionistas.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
AB - Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
KW - Access to information
KW - Checklist
KW - Evidence-based medicine
KW - Meta-Analysis
KW - Review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050102326&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050102326&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
DO - 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85050102326
SN - 2173-1292
VL - 20
SP - 148
EP - 160
JO - Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica
JF - Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica
IS - 2
ER -